DocsScienceQuickstart

Your first study.

From a signed-out browser to a finished, preregistered study with its analysis attached. Ten minutes of reading, most of which is the run doing the work.

§ 01Sign in

Open science.essarion.com and create an account with an email and password, or use Sign in with Essarion if the deployment has the shared Essarion ID provider configured — the button only renders when it does. Either route lands you in the same place; see Access & accounts for the details.

Every research model is available to any signed-in account. There is no per-model gate.

§ 02Ask a scientific question

Write the question the way you would ask a colleague. The engine parses it into a structured hypothesis before it does anything else, so a claim reads better than a keyword.

Questions that work
Does metformin use reduce all-cause mortality in non-diabetic adults?

Is elevated PCSK9 expression associated with worse outcomes in
hepatocellular carcinoma?

Do GLP-1 receptor agonists show a consistent effect on
cardiovascular endpoints across published trials?
TipState a directional claim if you have one. The engine treats your claim as H1 — the hypothesis under test — and then goes looking for what would refute it. A vague prompt produces a vague hypothesis, and the evidence gates are unforgiving about vague hypotheses.

§ 03Pick a depth

Depth sets how much literature is pulled, how many sources are deep-read, how high the evidence bar sits, and which tools the loop may reach for.

ModeUse it whenProduces
scanYou want orientation on a topic fast.A brief. No paper.
deep_diveThe default. You want a real answer you can defend.A preregistered paper.
exhaustiveThe question matters enough to wait for it.A paper plus replication graph and extracted figures.

§ 04Choose your sources (optional)

The settings panel lists every connector and skill in the workbench with an on/off switch. All thirteen connectors are key-free, so the list is about scope rather than credentials — turn off clinicaltrials for a pure basic-science question, or leave everything on and let the planner decide what it needs. Defaults are sensible; skipping this step is fine.

The same catalog is available programmatically:

GET/api/v1/biomed/catalog

It returns each connector and skill with its id, label, category, description, and default_on flag.

§ 05Watch it work

A run streams its reasoning as it goes. You will see the planner state a hypothesis, write and hash a preregistered plan, then start cycling: pick a tool, run it, read the result, update the posterior, decide what to do next.

EventWhat it means
biomed.thinkingThe planner's reasoning for the step it is about to take.
biomed.tool.intentThe tool it selected and the arguments it chose.
biomed.loop.stepA completed iteration of the reactive loop.
biomed.scratchpad.patchAn update to the run's working memory.
biomed.verdict.shiftEvidence moved the posterior — the direction and the size of the move.
biomed.brief.emittedThe run produced its brief.

Verdict shifts are the ones worth watching. They are the moments the run changed its mind, and they are the honest record of what the evidence did.

Streaming a run's events
GET/api/v1/research/{session_id}/events
GET/api/v1/research/{session_id}/status
GET/api/v1/research/{session_id}/result

§ 06Read the result

Read it in this order — it is the order that catches problems fastest:

  1. The verdict and posterior. What did it conclude, and how confident is the number rather than the prose?
  2. The preregistered plan. What did it commit to before it looked? Anything analysed outside that plan is labelled exploratory.
  3. The multiverse curve, on deep_dive and above. Does the effect survive every reasonable specification, or only the one that was picked?
  4. The notebook. Open the cells behind any number that matters to you.
  5. The references. Each is a real record from a real database, not a reconstructed citation.
CautionA run that reports a brief instead of a paper is not a failed run. It means the evidence did not clear the gates — too few pooled effect sizes, too few independent sources, or too few distinct labs. That is the system refusing to overclaim, and it is the most useful thing it does.

§ 07Export

Take the finished work out in Markdown, LaTeX, BibTeX, DOCX, or PDF. LaTeX and BibTeX come out as a matched pair, so a paper drops into an existing manuscript without re-keying the references.

Exports
GET  /api/v1/export/{session_id}/markdown
GET  /api/v1/export/{session_id}/latex
GET  /api/v1/export/{session_id}/bibtex
POST /api/v1/export/{session_id}/docx
POST /api/v1/export/{session_id}/pdf

§ 08Where to go next